How to Compare Two Painting Quotes That Look Nothing Alike

Two numbers, two completely different jobs

You asked three contractors to price the same house and got three numbers with a wide spread and almost nothing else in common. The instinct is to decide the high bid is padded or the low bid is a find. Usually neither is true. The spread exists because you are holding three descriptions of three different amounts of work, all filed under the same job title. Painting is unusual that way. In most trades the scope is anchored to a physical thing being installed, so the bids converge. Here the scope is almost entirely hours, and hours are invisible on a page.

A painting quote is a scope document that happens to have a price on it. The price is the only part that compares cleanly, which is exactly why it takes over the decision. If you want the comparison to mean anything, you have to make the scopes line up first, and that costs about fifteen minutes of asking everyone the same questions. Fifteen minutes now, or a repaint years earlier than you planned. It is not a close call, but it does require you to be the one who asks, because nobody volunteers a longer scope than the competition.

Find the prep paragraph, or notice that there is not one

Start at the top of each quote and look for preparation. Not the word prep by itself, the actual verbs: washing, scraping, sanding, caulking, patching, priming. A quote that describes what happens to the surfaces before color goes on is telling you where its hours went. A quote that jumps straight to product and color has left the biggest part of the job undescribed. Prep is measured in hours, and hours are the price, so a quote that says nothing about preparation is saying nothing about most of its own number.

Absence is not proof of anything, and plenty of good painters write short estimates. But it is worth one direct question in writing, because this is where the money is. Ask what gets washed, what gets scraped, what gets primed, and what happens where the old finish has already failed. If two bidders answer that very differently, you have located your price gap. You are not testing anybody or being difficult. You are making sure three quotes are answering the same question about the same house before you compare them on a single line.

The word coats should have a number in front of it

Then look for the coat count. It is remarkable how often the number is simply missing. Apply paint to all walls can honestly mean one coat, and one coat over a sound primed surface is a legitimate approach in some situations, while one coat over failing exterior paint is not an approach at all. Coats also interact with everything above them. Two coats over a chalky, unwashed wall is still two coats bonded to loose powder, so the number only starts to mean something once the prep answer is in hand.

Two coats over proper prep and one coat over none look identical the day the crew loads the truck. They separate later, and they separate first in the places you look at most. Ask every bidder for the number in writing. If the answer is as many as it takes to look right, that is a fine answer too, as long as it is written down where you can point at it. Nobody minds writing it down. This is the sort of detail that goes missing purely because it never got asked about in the first place.

Scope: what is in, what is out, and what nobody mentioned

Scope is where quotes silently diverge. Ceilings in or out. Closets in or out. Trim and doors included, or walls only. Garage door, garage interior, outbuildings, fences, the shed nobody looked at. Number of colors, since each additional color is another cut-in and another setup. Whether the crew is moving furniture or you are the night before. Every one of those is a real cost, and every one is a place where two bidders can both be completely honest and still be describing different jobs to you.

Build one short checklist and hand the same one to every bidder: which surfaces, how many colors, how many coats, what prep, what happens to areas that turn out worse than they looked, and what is explicitly excluded. When those answers come back on a page each, the differences stop being mysterious and the comparison becomes an actual comparison rather than a read on who sounded most confident. It also makes the follow-up conversation short, because for the first time everybody involved is looking at the same page and arguing about the same house.

What the low bid is quietly not doing

There is nothing wrong with a low bid. Crew size, overhead, scheduling and how badly somebody wants the work all move a price legitimately. But a bid dramatically under the others is usually buying that gap somewhere, and there are only a few places to buy it: prep hours, coats, scope, or time spent on slow detail work like trim, edges and cut-in lines. Prep and coats are where the hours hide, which makes them the easiest hours in the business to remove without anybody noticing until well after the check clears.

So ask. Not accusingly, just plainly. What prep is in there, how many coats, which surfaces, and what happens if a wall needs more scraping than expected. Someone working to a genuinely lean number will tell you exactly what they are and are not doing, and occasionally that is the right trade for you. The bad outcome is not paying less. It is paying less without knowing what you bought. Working cheap is a legitimate strategy. Being unclear about what cheap bought you is a risk somebody else has decided you are taking.

Questions on this topic